Friday, October 31, 2008

Kissel Arrest

Brooke Avery

Kissel Arrest

CEO and President of Kissel Realty Kenneth Kissel was arrested in Sacramento Wednesday morning on nine counts of criminal negligence.

Kissel, 61, was arrested at around 9 a.m. at his home at 100 American River Drive. The arrest is involving the deaths of nine tenants who were occupying the four-plex that Kissel Realty owns during the time of deaths, said Sacramento County District Attorney Marvin Coe in a press conference at the Sacramento Superior Court House.

Brother and sister Lloyd McKitridge, 31, and Lorita McKitridge, 29, Lloyd’s 12 and 14 year old sons and Lorita’s five younger children were among the people who were found dead in their home due to carbon monoxide poisoning on Sept 3. The poisoning is confirmed to have come from a faulty furnace. The property was located at 4310 Berkeley Court in Sacramento.

The building was inspected on Aug. 28 in response to complaints from the neighbors about the look of the building. Upon inspection, a faulty furnace was noted and recorded in an inspection report. The faulty furnace was repeatedly reported to Kissel, but no action took place to fix the problem.

“We need to stop allowing landlords to shirk their duty,” said Coe.

Coe said Kissel knew of the hazard, but decided to not act in the interest of his tenants. If found guilty, Kissel may face one to three years in prison per count of criminal negligence.

“You are responsible for the well-being of the people on your property,” said Coe. “Frankly, we need to hold landlords accountable.”

Kissel, the most prominent landlord in Sacramento County, has been the CEO and President of Kissel Realty since 1988, and has owned the property of interest for at least 10 years said Coe. This was the first time he has been cited for a code violation.

The only person who may have details about what happened directly before the deaths is Johnny Cole, 31. Cole was found unconscious on the steps of the house at the time of the accident. He was later taken to Mercy General Hospital where he was in critical condition. He left the hospital as soon as he was physically able, and has been missing for about one to two weeks authorities said.

As the only survivor of the accident, authorities are looking for him so that they may help him and ask routine questions about the details of the deaths. Cole, who is believed to be a transient, is believed to be the person living in the car found on the property.

Neither Kenneth Kissel nor Kissel’s lawyer Irving Karnecki were available for comment.

A funeral for the victims took place on Sunday at Bethel AME Church on 1452 2nd Avenue in Sacramento. They were buried at Restvell Cemetery later that day.

MLK Jr.

Brooke Avery

Analysis of Martin Luther King Jr. and “Nonviolent Resistance”

Martin Luther King Jr. promoted peaceful demonstrations and fought for equality without fists or rage. Because of this, he is considered a pioneer of the Civil Rights movement. Through his speeches and essays, King moved hundreds of people and persuaded them that his approach was the right and just way to gain equality for all. His essay, “Nonviolent Resistance” talks about the reasons why using nonviolence is the best approach. We can see through comparing it to the MAPP and Kurt Vonnegut Jr.’s “How to Write with Style”, why “Nonviolent Resistance” stands out to readers. MAPP is an acronym for Message, Audience, Persona, and Purpose. Kurt Vonnegut Jr.’s “How to Write with Style” describes the necessities that are needed in order to portray your own personal style in your writing. “Nonviolent Resistance” is effective because it clearly mirrors the MAPP and follows Vonnegut’s rules of style of writing accurately.

By looking at his past experience; being president of the SCLC, leading marches, delivering speeches, and even being arrested for what he believed was right, we understand that King had a strong passion behind what he wrote. This passion is important in your writing. Vonnegut says that in order to communicate your message most effectively when writing something, make sure that it’s something that you have a strong feeling for, “Find a subject you care about and which you in the heart feel others should care about. It is this genuine caring, and not your games with language, which will be the most compelling and seductive element” (pg. 22). Martin Luther King uses this technique very effectively, especially in his final paragraph, “The way of nonviolence means a willingness to suffer and sacrifice. It may mean going to jail...It may even mean physical death. But if physical death is the price that a man must pay to free his children and his white brethren from a permanent death of the spirit, then nothing can be more redemptive”( pg.61). The last paragraph of the essay was compelling, conveying to the audience that he feels strongly about what he writes. King’s willingness to be a martyr for his cause is reflected by his readiness to go to prison, and even die for what he feels is right, and he lets his audience know this. When an audience recognizes that you firmly feel for what you’re writing, they’re more inclined to believe and listen to what you write.

In “Nonviolent Resistance” MLK is very aware that his audience consists of blacks and understands what they are working toward. We can see this when he states, “The Negro must work passionately and unrelentingly for full stature as a citizen, but he must not use inferior methods to gain it” (pg.261). In order to write effectively, you must correctly address your audience. To do this, you must know who your audience is, be aware of the content of what you’re writing to your audience, and use correct techniques in order to make the audience pay attention to you. Looking at this evidence, we see that King addresses the fact that blacks want citizenship. By doing this, King appealed to his audience more because he recognized what they want.

Another reason King’s essay is effective is because of the voice that he uses. Throughout the whole essay, he projects himself as a man who is strong and just. He’s not writing like he’s seeking vengeance, because he’s not. And he’s not writing like he has hatred, because he doesn’t. King writes like he is a Baptist Minister who is seeking equality, which he is, “The job of the negro is to show them that they have nothing to fear, that the Negro understands and forgives and is ready to forget the past. He must convince the white man that all he seeks is justice, for both himself and the white man” (pg.261). His writing reflects how he feels and what type of person he is, which the MAPP also refers to as writing with a persona. The persona is the voice of the essay. According to Create a Mapp, when deciding what type of persona you want to project, you have to think of the questions, What image of myself do I want to project, How can I establish my credibility, and what kind of language will be most effective?. King establishes his credibility to himself by writing through his own persona, which is also what Vonnegut says is the best way to go. In “How to Write with Style” Vonnegut says, “I myself find that I trust my own writing most, and others seem to trust it most, too, when I sound like a person from Indianapolis, which is what I am” (pg.23). King finds trust in who he has and uses that to tell us his message.

Throughout the whole essay, King makes it clear that his purpose is to persuade blacks to use nonviolence when demonstrating against the law. By telling us his purpose, he guides us to his message that he wants to express. According to the MAPP, the last essential piece of writing is the purpose which is the “action or thought you hope to elicit from your reader”. King clearly states it in one of his last paragraphs, “We will take direct action against injustice without waiting for other agencies to act. We will not obey unjust laws or submit to unjust practices. We will do this peacefully, openly, cheerfully, because our aim is to persuade. We adopt the means of nonviolence because our end is a community at peace with itself” (Nonviolent Resistance). According to Vonnegut, this is very important, “Never include a sentence which does not either remark on character or advance the action” (pg.22). King’s essay is organized so that the whole time you read it, you understand what his purpose is. Every paragraph has a different point and ties to his main purpose.

We can see through the MAPP and Kurt Vonnegut Jr.’s “How to Write with Style”, that King writes very effectively. King’s essay reflects the points of the MAPP and “How to Write with Style”. “Nonviolent Resistance” is a parallel to the points of the MAPP and also emulates Vonnegut’s main points, which are to write about something you care about, having a purpose in your writing, and to sound like the person you are. King’s writing in this essay is a good example of an effective style of writing.

Skate Park

Brooke Avery

Oct.13 2008

28th and B Skate Park

28th and B Skate Park is a Safe Haven for Many

Skateboarders have had a reputation of terrorizing private property and causing havoc in public streets.

But at 28th and B Skate Park, skaters are free to “Ollie” and “grind” as much as they please. Located at Sutter's Landing Regional Park, the skate park offers more than a deserted building would.

With a sitting area for parents to lounge in, and ramps that are allowed to be moved and altered, the park offers services that young skateboarders are encouraged to take advantage of.

“There’s nowhere else for skaters to skate, so they come here,” said Andrew, 21, one of the supervisors who oversee the park.

The skate park looks like a renovated hangar, which Andrew said used to be an old trash facility. The old hangar is painted wall to wall with graffiti art of men screaming, women dancing, and a few unrecognizable images. With skateboarders pushing and kicking all around the facility, the park looks a little out of place in the middle of quiet and serene Sutter’s Landing.

“This place is great for younger skaters to come,” said Andrew. “Because unlike at the skate park at Power Inn, they don’t get punked and bullied here. They can skate as much as they want, for a small fee.”

The park costs $3 dollars if someone wants to skate, and is free for those who want to sit in a table and watch.

The park has been open for six years, said Andrew. It is run by the Department of Parks and Recreation of the City of Sacramento.

The park also allows rollerbladers and people who use scooters, but supervisors are weary of bikes due to the pegs that are able to cause damage to the ramps. Nonetheless, patrons are grateful for the park.

“It’s a lot better than skating outside,” said Maurice, 9. “I don’t have to watch out for cars, and they have things I can grind off of here.”

The park, which is open to all ages, is popular during the fall and winter, said Andrew. Many people don’t come in the summer because of the weather during that time of the year.

Although it is mandatory for skaters to wear a helmet, those over 18 years of age have the option of wearing knee and elbow pads. A sign-in waiver is also needed to be complete before one can skate, said Andrew.

“A lot of parents feel comfortable with us here supervising everybody,” said Andrew.

He continued on to say that skaters of all ages come to the park, including well known local skaters like Brandon Beibel.

The park once offered snacks, said Andrew, but had to stop because the costs of snacks was beginning to outweigh the revenue that was being taken in.

“Frequent customers would come in and just take snacks because they felt comfortable here,” said Andrew. “But snacks will be back soon within two weeks. We just need to hammer down a little more.”

The facility is an easy option for many.

“Oh that’s an easy question,” said Nate, 12, when asked why he skates at the park. “Because I love to skate.”

Andrew Dellas- 330.620.0089

Malcolm X

Brooke Avery

Analysis of Malcolm X and “The Black Revolution”

A major leader during the 1960s, Malcolm X was known for his radical ideas and for his Muslim beliefs. Malcolm X was convincing because he made great use of rhetoric techniques. For example, in his speech “The Black Revolution” he uses agitation, propaganda, and rhetorical schemes and tropes. His main focus in the speech was to target his audience’s emotions because he knew that once he could get to their emotions, they would be more open to his ideas. Using rhetorical devices, such as engaging his audience’s emotions in his speech, was very effective.

Malcolm X, formally known as Malcolm Little, was well known for his extreme ideas on racism in American Society. His radical ideas were due to circumstances that he encountered growing up. According to Spartacus Educational, Malcolm was the son of a Baptist preacher and a mother from the West Indies. In 1925, Malcolm was born in Nebraska but his family later moved to Michigan because his father had a confrontation with the Ku Klux Klan. When his father died and his mother was sent to a mental institution, Malcolm moved to Boston with his sister. There he became addicted to cocaine and was involved in crime such as robbery. This later led him to ten years in prison. While in prison, Malcolm converted to the Black Muslim faith. Once released in 1952, Malcolm met Elijah Muhammad, leader of the Nation of Islam. Muhammad influenced him and deepened Malcolm’s involvement in the Muslim faith. Because of his faith, he changed his last name from Little to X, believing that “Little” was a representation of white control. Malcolm X supported black power and spoke against integration until he traveled to Mecca. After his travels in 1964, Malcolm left the Nation of Islam and instead of speaking against integration, spoke of world brotherhood and supported blacks working with whites to end racial inequality. He was despised for his change in thought and in February of 1965, died of a gunshot. Three black Muslims were accused of his assassination.

Malcolm spoke “The Black Revolution” in June of 1963 to an audience at Abyssinian Baptist Church in Harlem, New York (“The Black Revolution” sec. 1). The speech addressed what was going on in America during the 1960’s. Based on “History of the United States 1945-1964,” America was very busy at the time in terms of international affairs. The Cold War was becoming more peaceful and the United States was secretly getting involved in the Vietnam War. Apart from international problems, America was also dealing with equality among minorities and whites at the home front. During the 1960’s many people who believed in equality for all fought back against inequality and segregation. Some of the leaders during this generation included Malcolm X, Martin Luther King Jr., and Cesar Chavez. The Civil Rights Movement was a fight against segregation that impacted the whole nation. Nonviolent resisters staged sit-ins and protested. Other people took matters into their own hands in order to gain equality.

Malcolm stands out for his extreme theologies and radical speeches. We can see this in “The Black Revolution”. The “Black Revolution” was a speech in which he expresses his belief that the only resolution to the racial inequality in America is complete separation. Malcolm backs up his argument comparing wolves, who he says are white people, and sheep, who are black. He says they can’t be mixed together in a den, a metaphor for society. Malcolm says this because in the Bible, God doesn’t even let his sheep integrate with goats, let alone wolves.

In “The Black Revolution” Malcolm X argues that truth will set people free. The truth, as Malcolm X believes, is not Christianity but rather the Muslim faith. In order for us to see the truth, we have to submit to Allah, the Muslim God. He believes the truth will open their eyes and help them become independent and realize who their enemies are. Malcolm adds on that whites have always known the truth, and that the reason they’re not showing blacks the truth is because they know that it will set them free. He continues and says that is the reason why blacks have been suppressed in America.

In the middle of his speech, Malcolm X furthers his point that there must be separation when he says that the reason blacks must separate from whites is because God will punish whites for what they have done. Malcolm believes blacks should leave before God strikes down on whites, in order to not be stuck in between. He goes on to say that in the past, God has always separated the abused from the abuser, so it’s fitting to do so in present time.

Toward the end of his speech, Malcolm reinforces his point that the only permanent solution is complete separation. He says that even if things were desegregated and blacks were given better jobs, it wouldn’t solve the problems of inequality. Malcolm X speaks of the government giving blacks goods, supplies, and machinery to help support them to create their own society. In his conclusion, he emphasizes his belief not to integrate with white men, and he also says America must take action and give blacks what is owed to them before God takes action.

One reason Malcolm X is effective is because he bases his rhetoric on his audience. He was invited to the Abyssinian Baptist Church by Dr. Powell, who was a congressman and a leader in the Harlem community. The members of the Abyssinian Baptist Church weren’t Muslims and didn’t share the same point of views as Malcolm X, which is a reason why he chose to speak at the church. According to Mary McEdwards, an Assistant Professor of Speech at CSU Northridge, “In reality, the audience of the agitator is always the public, the members of the community or nation. They do not hold his opinion, they are indifferent, or more probably, hostile to his view because he advocates a change so extreme that they see themselves as possible losers if the change occur” (McEdwards, page 38). Malcolm X’s goal was to persuade the members of the church and his enemies to want complete segregation; he knew that the only way that he could persuade the members of the church and his enemies to have the same views was to stir them up emotionally.

Agitation also contributes to Malcolm X’s effective rhetoric. Mary McEdwards explains what agitation is, “Agitation is an unwarranted and unethical attack on persons, institutions, and ideas” (page 36). McEdwards states that agitation means “to move with a violent motion; to stir up or excite; to perturb” (page 36). Throughout the speech, Malcolm uses agitation to stir up emotions, causing the black masses to second guess their decision of integration with the white oppressors. His whole speech unethically attacks the idea of integration. One example is when he said, “Only a blind man will walk into the open embrace of his enemy, and only a blind people, a people who are blind to the truth about their enemies, will seek to embrace or integrate with that enemy.” This statement causes people who want to integrate with the white oppressors to have doubts because they don’t want to be seen as blind people. He also attacks the idea of integration by using agitation when he states, “Jesus two thousand years ago looked down the wheel of time and saw your and my plight here today and he knew the tricky high court, Supreme Court, desegregation decisions would only lull you into a deeper sleep, and the tricky promises of the hypocritical politicians on civil rights legislation would only be designed to advance you and me from ancient slavery to modern slavery” (Paragraph 6). The black masses were trying to overthrow their suppression and for Malcolm to say that the legislation is just trying to advance them to modern slavery would affect a lot of people’s emotions. Malcolm X understood that in order for him to change people’s beliefs and to influence them into making radical decisions, he would have to incorporate agitation into his speech to strike their emotions.

Throughout the whole speech Malcolm X mainly relies on pathos to appeal to his audience. Pathos, according to The Art of Rhetoric, is the appeal based on emotion. His words are very emotionally loaded and are very figurative when speaking about whites, blacks, and America. Malcolm continuously refers to whites in a negative connotation. One example of this would be when he says, “God wants us to separate ourselves from this wicked white race…” (paragraph11).By calling the white race the “wicked white race”, Malcolm automatically sets a barrier between whites and his audience. The word “wicked” is a negative connotation, and no one wants to be a part of that. This type of propaganda is also called name-calling, “…this device consists of labeling people or ideas with words of bad connotation…when the propagandist uses name-calling, he doesn’t want us to think-merely react…” (Cross, paragraphs 4 &7). Malcolm’s use of the phrase is emotionally charged and lacks real evidence or logic. When Malcolm uses name-calling, he contributes to his pathos-based speech.

Malcolm uses name-calling in his speech, but he also uses another method of propaganda called “glory by association”. He does this when he says, “He [Elijah Muhammad] warns us to remember Noah never taught integration, Noah taught separation; Moses never taught integration, Moses taught separation” (paragraph 10). Malcolm compares the situation at hand with biblical situations. Glory by association helps when you want to give your audience a good feeling, “In glory by association, the propagandist tries to transfer the positive feelings of something we love and respect to the group or idea he wants us to accept” (Cross). Malcolm tries to justify his solution by saying that biblical figures did the same thing. Being that his audience is mostly a religious group, this method is very effective because they are deeply rooted in religious history. His audience is more inclined to believe him since he’s referring to something that they firmly believe in.

This same concept connects to one of Denton and Hahn’s points in “The Rhetorical Presidency”. They say that political language has many functions, one of which is to connect past glories to the audience, “An important function of political language, therefore, is to link us to past glories and reveal the future in order to reduce uncertainty in a world of ever increasing complexity and doubt” (paragraph 15). By connecting his audience to the past glories of Moses and Noah, Malcolm makes his solution more appealing. They see that Moses and Noah were successful, so it gives the audience more assurance that they will be successful if they choose to go along with Malcolm.

Along with connecting past glories to the audience, Malcolm adds on to his pathos-based speech by using the concept called Argumentum Ad Populum, also known as stroking. He uses this when he refers to blacks, “No one is more innocent than the poor, blind American so-called Negro” (paragraph 11). When Malcolm calls his audience innocent, poor, and blind, he patronizes them, which is exactly what argumentum ad populum is all about, “…being stroked or soothed with compliments until they come to like the person doing the complimenting-and by extension, his or her ideas”(Cross, paragraph 14). Although being called innocent, poor and blind isn’t a compliment, the audience is still appealed to Malcolm because he has mercy and gives a sense that he feels sorry for them. In turn, this makes the audience more willing to accept what Malcolm is connected to, more specifically his ideas.

Malcolm X’s rhetoric was also effective due to his continuous use of rhetorical schemes and tropes. He believed the only way the black masses would really be free from slavery was through truth. Throughout his speech he reiterates that point through “anaphora”, which is the repetition of the same word or group of words at the beginning of successive clauses (“Rhetorical Schemes and Tropes”, number 3). One example is when he says, “Truth will open our eyes and enable us to see the white wolf as he really is. Truth will stand us on our own feet. Truth will make us walk for ourselves…” (Paragraph 6).He uses this technique to make his audience believe that they don’t know the truth, and by believing him they would learn what the truth is. Another rhetorical device Malcolm uses in “The Black Revolution” is personification. He uses this method to emphasize his point that blacks should not live in America. He states, “If America can’t atone for the crime she has committed against the twenty million so-called Negroes, if she can’t undo the evils that she has brutally and mercilessly heaped upon our people these past four hundred years, The Honorable Elijah Muhammad says that America has signed her own doom. And our people, would be foolish to accept her deceitful offers of integration at this late date into her doomed society” (paragraph 12). Malcolm refers to America as “she” and “her”. Doing this makes it seem like America has a body and soul. This method helps because it puts more power into his statement. It gives the audience the idea that America is a person, and that they must fight against her.

Overall, Malcolm X’s rhetoric is very effective and because of this, his speeches are convincing. He utilized rhetoric to help in his persuasion to his audience that his way was the right way. Malcolm made it seem that the audience would be foolish and would be going against the teachings of Biblical figures if they didn’t do what he suggested. His speech was strong and powerful and had the ability to completely change someone’s beliefs in a matter of minutes. His rhetoric was effective enough to brainwash someone if they were not aware of all the rhetorical devices that he used.

Jackman School

Brooke Avery

Jackman Middle

Students are getting a head start to success as they learn how to balance school and fun at the after school program at Samuel Jackman Middle School in Sacramento.

The afterschool program is available to all students at the school. Running from 3:30 p.m. to 5:30 p.m., children in the program are able to get help with their homework, work on arts, and go outside to play.

The program is serving 148 students currently. The popularity and need for the program has pushed the program to have once held as much as 240 students, far past the programs capacity of 187 students. Because the program assists so many students, there are many different rooms that house them across the school campus, and organization is a must.

“I like it, it’s something to do afterschool,” ” said Nigel, 13, an 8th grader at the school. “If I were at home I would probably just watch T.V. and do my homework at the last minute.”

Michael, a 7th grader, agreed. “It’s fun because a lot of my friends are here. Some of us have the same homework so we just do it together, have it reviewed sometimes, then go outside and play.”

The need for afterschool programs in the lives of youth is being recognized by leaders.

In a recent press release by Senator Barbara Boxer, Boxer explained the necessity of such programs, “Children who regularly attend have better grades and behavior in school, lower incidences of drug use, violence and pregnancy, and are less likely to be either the perpetrators or victims of crime.”

One of main goals of the afterschool program is to enrich the student’s lives through sports, arts, drama and academics, something they may not be able to receive at home. In addition to something positive to do after school, students are able to receive credit towards their grades if they are able to show that they have attended, done their homework, and completed a reading log.

“The program mainly focuses on a strong foundation for the students. We try not to turn down a student to be a part of the program because we know how much this is strongly needed,” said Academic Coordinator Nafeesah Mustafa-Rasheed.

Samuel Jackman Middle School, which serves 7th and 8th graders, is able to serve the students with the program free of charge due to a federal grant, said Rasheed.

The afterschool program works very closely with the Afterschool Safety and Educational Program, a program that reaches students in and outside the district.

“It supports athletes essentially,” said Rasheed. “It is a strong foundation for men of color more specifically. We try to educate parents of the program so that our athletes in middle school are able to go on to high school and still be eligible to play sports, because their grades are good.”

Both programs are aimed toward teaching students to excel in life by learning to set a time for school work and play.

“We try to teach students that once they get to high school, grades really do matter, especially if you’re involved in extracurricular activities like sports. These programs teach students to excel in both aspects of their lives.”

Fall Festival

Brooke Avery

Courtyard School Fall Festival

27 October, 2008

Fall festivities began on Saturday for students at Courtyard School located in Midtown Sacramento.

Courtyard School held it’s annual Fall Festival on 24th and C Street. Among other things were games, face painting, food, gift vendors, arts and crafts, and free admission into the festival.

Open to the public and with free admission, the Fall Festival is something that many of the students look forward to.

“I look forward to it because of the food and games,” said Ashley, 9. “Me and my classmates were talking about it all week.”

Courtyard School is very different of its kind. Private and non-profit, the independent school carefully accepts students who fill out an application to attend. The school focuses on academics as well as the arts, and serves students in transitional kindergarten through sixth grade.

Ashley’s mom Margaret Cordova, 40, is satisfied with the school’s performance.

“Courtyard is different because they understand that every child’s learning style is different. Because of this, they are flexible with learning methods and focus on individuals.”

At the festival, children played with one another as many adults sat in chairs and ate. Decorated with haystacks and pumpkins, and the smell of food in the air, the festival was full of children who were eager to show off their costumes to one another.

Miranda, 8, was one of the children who dressed for the event. Sporting a cheetah-print dress and a bone that sat on the top of her head, she insisted that Halloween should be a week long.

“I like the festival because I feel like I’m starting Halloween early,” she said. “I get to see everyone in costumes and get food even before Halloween. It should always be like this.”

Her friend Catey, 8, dressed as a cowgirl, added onto her statement, “No, it would be better if we had a festival everyday up until Halloween.”

The festival started at 11 a.m. and came to a close at 3 p.m.

-----

Margaret Cordova 916.388.5834

George Simmel

Brooke Avery

There were many different influences that affected the idea of the tradition of urban sociology. Among many were George Simmel, a German influence, and Robert Park, Louis Wirth, and Herbert Gans, American influences. They looked at what and how things influence big groups in an industrial atmosphere.

George Simmel’s “Metropolis and Mental Life” looked at the effects on our psychological state, and looks at how a large scale affects our minds. He believed that a large society was such a complex entity, and that any human being is likely to feel over stimulated. He said that because of this, urbanites must have a blasé attitude. If not for this blasé attitude, urbanites will not have psychic liberty. He continued to say that the city is a cash nexus, and that the city is organized around money. This cash nexus keeps everyone speaking the same language, so to speak.

Robert Park’s “The Urban Community as a Spatial and Moral Order”, looked at the society in a slightly different way than the German influence of Simmel. Park studied the city of Chicago, because it was a typical portrait of America. He came to a conclusion that everyone in their own gemeinshafts followed its norms. Park said that these gemeinshafts provided liberty, but also provided a home where you would be able to be rooted when you come back from the central city. Simmel said that gemeinshafts can be alienating, but Park argued that instead, they give you a home to belong to. Park also said that people are afraid of the mass society; that there was no independence of thought and so people become followers. This causes people to be more easily swayed by charming leaders because they may lose all connection with family and the values and morals that family provides. Park continued to say that with the growth of the mass society, communities start overlapping, and an elimination of gemeinshafts starts to occur.

Louis Wirth, another American influence, wrote “Urbanism as a Way of Life” in 1938. Wirth argued that size, density, and heterogeneity affected the urban way of life. He said that these things affected behavioral patterns. Wirth argued that these three things caused not a primary-group relationship, but instead a second type of relationship that is impersonal and shallow. He said that urbanites start to feel isolated and in response, are forced to join impersonal, large groups. These groups replace the primary groups that are found in rural areas.

Herbert Gans looks at the urban tradition through a different perspective. He questioned mass society, early ideas of mass society, and urbanism. Gans studied an Italian slum from 1955-1958. Gans found that in urban gemeinshafts, people felt close to each other. He noticed a very intact village. He noticed that in contrast to a mass society, a society of people who were dependant on each other. Gans noticed this when he learned that people in the Italian ghetto didn’t want to move when they found out that there were plans to tear down the ghetto. Gans found that people in there gemeinshafts were content with where they lived because they felt so close to each other.

Gans findings were different from Simmel’s, Park’s and Wirth’s in that he found that these groups in the city were more homogeneous than anything. Their social and cultural roots were strong enough to protect them from the effects of number, density and heterogeneity.

Gans went on to explain that instead, social class affected them more than living in a place where number, density and heterogeneity may have an effect on a person. Put simply, Gans argued that location matters less than social class, or ones position in the life cycle. Gans argued that Wirth faltered in three different ways. Gans says that the first mistake Wirth made was that he only studied the inner city. The findings that Wirth had cannot be generalized for an entire area. Gans also said that there is not enough evidence to prove that number, density, and heterogeneity can result in isolation of a person. Thirdly, Gans argued that there is good reason to doubt that size, density, and heterogeneity produce alienation. According to Gans, class has more to do with alienation than these three things.