Brooke Avery
Analysis of Malcolm X and “The Black Revolution”
A major leader during the 1960s, Malcolm X was known for his radical ideas and for his Muslim beliefs. Malcolm X was convincing because he made great use of rhetoric techniques. For example, in his speech “The Black Revolution” he uses agitation, propaganda, and rhetorical schemes and tropes. His main focus in the speech was to target his audience’s emotions because he knew that once he could get to their emotions, they would be more open to his ideas. Using rhetorical devices, such as engaging his audience’s emotions in his speech, was very effective.
Malcolm X, formally known as Malcolm Little, was well known for his extreme ideas on racism in American Society. His radical ideas were due to circumstances that he encountered growing up. According to Spartacus Educational, Malcolm was the son of a Baptist preacher and a mother from the
Malcolm spoke “The Black Revolution” in June of 1963 to an audience at
Malcolm stands out for his extreme theologies and radical speeches. We can see this in “The Black Revolution”. The “Black Revolution” was a speech in which he expresses his belief that the only resolution to the racial inequality in
In “The Black Revolution” Malcolm X argues that truth will set people free. The truth, as Malcolm X believes, is not Christianity but rather the Muslim faith. In order for us to see the truth, we have to submit to Allah, the Muslim God. He believes the truth will open their eyes and help them become independent and realize who their enemies are. Malcolm adds on that whites have always known the truth, and that the reason they’re not showing blacks the truth is because they know that it will set them free. He continues and says that is the reason why blacks have been suppressed in
In the middle of his speech, Malcolm X furthers his point that there must be separation when he says that the reason blacks must separate from whites is because God will punish whites for what they have done. Malcolm believes blacks should leave before God strikes down on whites, in order to not be stuck in between. He goes on to say that in the past, God has always separated the abused from the abuser, so it’s fitting to do so in present time.
Toward the end of his speech, Malcolm reinforces his point that the only permanent solution is complete separation. He says that even if things were desegregated and blacks were given better jobs, it wouldn’t solve the problems of inequality. Malcolm X speaks of the government giving blacks goods, supplies, and machinery to help support them to create their own society. In his conclusion, he emphasizes his belief not to integrate with white men, and he also says
One reason Malcolm X is effective is because he bases his rhetoric on his audience. He was invited to the
Agitation also contributes to Malcolm X’s effective rhetoric. Mary McEdwards explains what agitation is, “Agitation is an unwarranted and unethical attack on persons, institutions, and ideas” (page 36). McEdwards states that agitation means “to move with a violent motion; to stir up or excite; to perturb” (page 36). Throughout the speech, Malcolm uses agitation to stir up emotions, causing the black masses to second guess their decision of integration with the white oppressors. His whole speech unethically attacks the idea of integration. One example is when he said, “Only a blind man will walk into the open embrace of his enemy, and only a blind people, a people who are blind to the truth about their enemies, will seek to embrace or integrate with that enemy.” This statement causes people who want to integrate with the white oppressors to have doubts because they don’t want to be seen as blind people. He also attacks the idea of integration by using agitation when he states, “Jesus two thousand years ago looked down the wheel of time and saw your and my plight here today and he knew the tricky high court, Supreme Court, desegregation decisions would only lull you into a deeper sleep, and the tricky promises of the hypocritical politicians on civil rights legislation would only be designed to advance you and me from ancient slavery to modern slavery” (Paragraph 6). The black masses were trying to overthrow their suppression and for Malcolm to say that the legislation is just trying to advance them to modern slavery would affect a lot of people’s emotions. Malcolm X understood that in order for him to change people’s beliefs and to influence them into making radical decisions, he would have to incorporate agitation into his speech to strike their emotions.
Throughout the whole speech Malcolm X mainly relies on pathos to appeal to his audience. Pathos, according to The Art of Rhetoric, is the appeal based on emotion. His words are very emotionally loaded and are very figurative when speaking about whites, blacks, and
Malcolm uses name-calling in his speech, but he also uses another method of propaganda called “glory by association”. He does this when he says, “He [Elijah Muhammad] warns us to remember Noah never taught integration, Noah taught separation; Moses never taught integration, Moses taught separation” (paragraph 10). Malcolm compares the situation at hand with biblical situations. Glory by association helps when you want to give your audience a good feeling, “In glory by association, the propagandist tries to transfer the positive feelings of something we love and respect to the group or idea he wants us to accept” (Cross). Malcolm tries to justify his solution by saying that biblical figures did the same thing. Being that his audience is mostly a religious group, this method is very effective because they are deeply rooted in religious history. His audience is more inclined to believe him since he’s referring to something that they firmly believe in.
This same concept connects to one of
Along with connecting past glories to the audience, Malcolm adds on to his pathos-based speech by using the concept called Argumentum Ad Populum, also known as stroking. He uses this when he refers to blacks, “No one is more innocent than the poor, blind American so-called Negro” (paragraph 11). When Malcolm calls his audience innocent, poor, and blind, he patronizes them, which is exactly what argumentum ad populum is all about, “…being stroked or soothed with compliments until they come to like the person doing the complimenting-and by extension, his or her ideas”(Cross, paragraph 14). Although being called innocent, poor and blind isn’t a compliment, the audience is still appealed to Malcolm because he has mercy and gives a sense that he feels sorry for them. In turn, this makes the audience more willing to accept what Malcolm is connected to, more specifically his ideas.
Malcolm X’s rhetoric was also effective due to his continuous use of rhetorical schemes and tropes. He believed the only way the black masses would really be free from slavery was through truth. Throughout his speech he reiterates that point through “anaphora”, which is the repetition of the same word or group of words at the beginning of successive clauses (“Rhetorical Schemes and Tropes”, number 3). One example is when he says, “Truth will open our eyes and enable us to see the white wolf as he really is. Truth will stand us on our own feet. Truth will make us walk for ourselves…” (Paragraph 6).He uses this technique to make his audience believe that they don’t know the truth, and by believing him they would learn what the truth is. Another rhetorical device Malcolm uses in “The Black Revolution” is personification. He uses this method to emphasize his point that blacks should not live in
Overall, Malcolm X’s rhetoric is very effective and because of this, his speeches are convincing. He utilized rhetoric to help in his persuasion to his audience that his way was the right way. Malcolm made it seem that the audience would be foolish and would be going against the teachings of Biblical figures if they didn’t do what he suggested. His speech was strong and powerful and had the ability to completely change someone’s beliefs in a matter of minutes. His rhetoric was effective enough to brainwash someone if they were not aware of all the rhetorical devices that he used.
No comments:
Post a Comment